Disneyland was Walt Disneyโ€™s biggest dream, and was also his most complicated and expensive project. Though Walt always envisioned a park completely independently owned and operated by Disney, he unfortunately couldnโ€™t afford to do that right from the beginning. To offset the cost of building the park, Disney hosted a number of sponsored attractions and restaurants that were not Disney-owned, particularly in Tomorrowland. In fact, for the first decade of park operation, Tomorrowland was more like โ€œSponsorlandโ€, with almost every single ride, shop, and restaurant owned and operated by a partnering company.

1967TomorrowlandExpansionandRenovation1ย Source: Sundry Collectibles

It didnโ€™t take long for the park to become an overwhelmingly popular attraction in Orange County, and Disney soon had enough money to start reclaiming valuable real estate in the park. But having tons of sponsors wasnโ€™t the only problem with Tomorrowland. As the park grew and changed, the futuristic land started to feel like it was behind the times, and it lacked the exciting dark rides and shows found in other lands. So rather than converting sponsored exhibits into Disney-owned exhibits, Imagineers decided to start from scratch.

1967TomorrowlandExpansionandRenovation2ย Source: SQSPCDN

The new Tomorrowland theme was โ€œWorld on the Moveโ€. And the world had changed since the park opened a decade earlier; people were moving faster and further thanks to all of the new highways in California. Imagineers created new attractions that brought Tomorrowland up to speed, like the Carousel of Progress, and even into the future, like on Rocketย to the Moon. Instead of walking through exhibits and galleries of futuristic American homes, guests now participated in the technology. They shrunk to the size of an atom (Adventure Thru Inner Space), soared above the landscape (PeopleMover), and stepped right into the center of a changing world (Circle-Vision 360).

The difference was night and day. Just look at how much the entrance changed the whole feel of the land. Here it is in 1955, before:

1967TomorrowlandExpansionandRenovation3ย Source: Disney History Institute

And after, in 1967:

1967TomorrowlandExpansionandRenovation4ย Source: Pin IMG

Tomorrowland had newfound energy, and was once again an exciting and innovative space in the park. Out of all of the lands in Disneyland, Tomorrowland has by far changed the most; attractions regularly close or change to fit whatever vision the world currently has for the future. Tomorrowland not only reflects a peek into the future, but the mindset of the times. In the 1950โ€™s, the exhibits were all about chemicals, plastics, and home technology. In the 60โ€™s, it became all about space travel and innovative transportation. Each decade in Tomorrowland has its own personality and identity, which means this land represents not only the future, but also the present people imagining that future.

1967TomorrowlandExpansionandRenovation5ย Source: Photo Bucket

Read aboutย Tomorrowlandโ€™s second major expansion & renovation โ€“ 1998โ€™s โ€œNew Tomorrowlandโ€ here.

4 Comments on Tomorrowland on the Move: 1967 Expansion and Renovation

  1. The article says: “In fact, for the first decade of park operation, Tomorrowland was more like โ€œSponsorlandโ€, with almost every single ride, shop, and restaurant owned and operated by a partnering company.” True, but seems to me in a rather disparaging way. Actually it was very smart of Walt Disney to get sponsors to pay for attractions & rides, in return for some static advertising. In 1955 it let him fill up Tomorrowland, and at a time that Disneyland itself was still something of a “novelty” and an “iffy” proposition. Disney provided the theme park location, the space, and they put up the money for the attraction. Good business, and it worked. I never minded it. Even the 1967 remake of Tomorrowland featured sponsored rides, such as McDonnell-Douglas, Monsanto, Goodyear, Bell Telephone, etc. What Disney also had in mind was ultimately to do the same, only on a colossal scale, for HIS vision of Florida — the real EPCOT — a big, experimental city where people actually lived, with surrounding business parks attracting all the big names in industry that these residents worked at. Walt carefully cultivated a lot of good-will and contacts with the business world in such sponsorship at Disneyland. Just a shame Walt’s EPCOT never got built.

    • My intention is certainly not to sound disparaging. Walt was in such a tricky position with the opening of his park, and I think it makes sense that he made the choices he did. Given how many more sponsored attractions existed in Tomorrowland vs. other lands, it stood out as “Sponsorland”. But I totally agree; partnerships have always been a fundamental part of the park’s history!

      PS – I know very little about EPCOT’s history – do you know why the concept changed so dramatically?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *